How do we measure the age of the forest?

We use a combination of remote sensing datasets to estimate the likely age and biomass of the forest. We use a variety of datasets to mitigate the effects of some uncertainties in the remote sensing datasets. We also use a tree species map, which allows us to estimate the maturity of the trees on a per-species basis. We are continually updating our methods to improve the accuracy of our estimates.

Why do we have the 3HA limit?

Note: This limit is somewhat arbitrary, but reflects the likelihood that smaller plots have higher uncertainties. For example, one source of uncertainty is the so-called boundary effect. The forest cartoon below shows a land defined by three pixels, each 30 by 30 m in size (figure 1 below). The green ellipse corresponds to the forest represented as a single patch. The pixels that lie on the forest-no-forest boundary have a higher likelihood of being classified incorrectly. This is shown in figure 2 and figure 3 below. Assuming that the forest should cover at least 50% of the pixel area to be classified as a forest, figure 2 shows the results of classification with zero errors. We call respectively the correctly classified forest and forest-free pixels as True Positives (TP) and True Negatives (TN). Figure 3, on the other hand, shows five incorrectly classified pixels: three false positives shown as the green pixels in the three corners labeled as FPs, and two false negatives shown as the white pixels with FN labels.

https://downloads.intercomcdn.com/i/o/604817519/0bfbc0f681bb9a088d928f00/Screenshot+2022-10-26+at+11.35.28.png

The cartoon of the land covers 90x90=8100 square meters or roughly one hectare (100 by 100 meters; note that we need 11 pixels to cover 1 ha of land). If we take instead of 9 pixels, representing here 1 ha, 33 pixels to fit 3 ha of land, there will be more pixels covered entirely by forest, and therefore there will be fewer incorrectly classified pixels. As mentioned above, 3 ha is somewhat arbitrary. E.g. by choosing 6 ha, we will have even higher classification accuracy, but then smaller landowners cannot be onboarded by Single.Earth.